Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceКинетика и катализ Kinetics and Catalysis

  • ISSN (Print) 0453-8811
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5413

Behavior of GdCoFeO Perovskite-Type Catalysts in the CO-Enriched Syngas Hydrogenation

You can
PII
S3034541325050049-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034541325050049
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
T.F. Sheshko
  • Occupation: Department of Physical and Colloidal Chemistry, Faculty of Science
  • Affiliation: RUDN University
E.M. Borodina
  • Occupation: Department of Physical and Colloidal Chemistry, Faculty of Science
  • Affiliation: RUDN University
L.G. Skvortsova
  • Occupation: Department of Physical and Colloidal Chemistry, Faculty of Science
  • Affiliation: RUDN University
P.V. Akhmina
  • Occupation: Department of Physical and Colloidal Chemistry, Faculty of Science
  • Affiliation: RUDN University
T.A. Kryuchkova
  • Occupation: Department of Physical and Colloidal Chemistry, Faculty of Science
  • Affiliation: RUDN University
I.A. Zvereva
  • Occupation: Department of Chemical Thermodynamics and Kinetics
  • Affiliation: Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University
A.G. Cherednichenko
  • Occupation: Department of Physical and Colloidal Chemistry, Faculty of Science
  • Affiliation: RUDN University
Volume/ Edition
Volume 66 / Issue number 5
Pages
395-409
Abstract
Complex perovskite-type oxide catalysts GdCoFeO (x = 0;0.2;0.5;0.8;1) were synthesized using by sol-gel technology and studied for their ability to hydrogenate a model biosynthetic gas. X-ray phase analysis (XFA), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), infrared Fourier spectrometry, nitrogen adsorption by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method, and temperature-programmable hydrogen reduction (TPR H) were used to characterize the samples. The nonstoichiometric oxygen content was determined by iodometric titration. The catalytic activity was tested in a reactor with a fixed bed. It was found that the introduction of both Fe and Co into the B-position of the perovskite structure leads to partial reduction of B ions to B, which is compensated for by the formation of oxygen vacancies. The composition of the complex oxides, the number of oxygen vacancies, and the fraction of partially reduced B metal ions all influence the catalytic properties. The synergistic effect in the production of light olefins from a sample with an equal amount of iron and cobalt at the B-position is related to the optimal number of oxygen vacancies and B/B ratio.
Keywords
синтез-газ диоксид углерода кобальт железо перовскиты олефины
Date of publication
01.03.2026
Year of publication
2026
Number of purchasers
0
Views
53

References

  1. 1. Gonçalves dos Santos R., Alencar A.C. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020. V. 45. № 36. P. 18114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.133
  2. 2. Muradov N. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2017. V. 42. № 20. P. 14058 s://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.101
  3. 3. Ahmad S.E., Upadhyayul S., Pant R.K. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. № 51. P. 27741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.015
  4. 4. Weber D., He T., Wong M., Moon C., Zhang A., Foley N., Ramer N.J., Zhang C. // Catalysts. 2021. V. 11. P. 1447. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11121447
  5. 5. Shesterkina A., Zhdanova Ch., Davshan N., Medvedev A., Kalmykov K., Dunaev S., Kustov L., Kustov A. // Green Synth. Catal. 2025. In Press. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.gresc.2025.04.004
  6. 6. Li Z., Wang J., Qu Y., Liu H., Tang C., Miao S., Feng Z., An H., Li C. // ACS Catal. 2017. V. 7. № 12. P. 8544. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03251
  7. 7. Saeidi S., Najari S., Hessel V., Wilson K., Keil F.J., Concepción P., Suib S.L., Rodrigues A.E. // Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2021. V. 85. Art. 100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2021.1009056
  8. 8. Ma Z., Porosoff M. // ACS Catal. 2019. V 9. № 3. P. 2639. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b05060
  9. 9. Jahangiri H., Bennett J., Mahjoubi P., Wilson K., Gua S. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014. V. 4. № 8. P. 2210. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY00327F
  10. 10. Кипнис М.А., Самохин П.В., Волнина Э.А., Магомедова М.В., Туркова Т.В. // Кинетика и катализ. 2022. Т. 63. № 3. С. 351 s://doi.org/10.31857/S045388112203008X
  11. 11. Albrecht M., Rodemerck U., Schneider M., Bröring M., Baabe D., Kondratenko E.V. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017. V. 204. P. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.017
  12. 12. Su X., Zhang J., Fan S., Ma O., Zhao T.-S. // RSC Adv. 2015. V. 5. P. 80196 s://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA12504A
  13. 13. Riedel T., Schau G., Jun K.W., Lee K.W. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001. V. 40. P. 1355 s://doi.org/10.1021/ie000084k
  14. 14. Satthawong R., Koizumi N., Song C., Prasassarakich P. // J. CO2 Util. 2013. V. 3. P. 102 s://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2013.10.002
  15. 15. Kim K.Y., Lee H., Noh W.Y., Shin J., Han S. J., Kim S.K., An K., Lee J.S. // ACS Catal. 2020. V. 10. № 15. P. 8660 s://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c01417
  16. 16. Яковенко Р.Е., Зубков И.Н., Савостьянов А.П., Соромотин В.Н., Краснякова Т.В., Папета О.П., Митченко С.А. // Кинетика и катализ. 2021. Т. 62. № 1. С. 109 s://doi.org/10.31857/S0453881121010159
  17. 17. Jahangiri H., Bennett J., Mahjoubi P., Wilson K., Sai Gua S. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014. V. 4. P. 2210. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CY00327F
  18. 18. Jun K.W., Roh H.S., Kim K.S., Ryu J.S., Lee K.W. // Appl Catal A: Gen. 2004. V. 259. № 2. P. 221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2003.09.034
  19. 19. Yao Y., Hildebrandt D., Glasser D., Liu X. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010. V. 49. P. 1106. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100414y
  20. 20. Visconti C.G., Martinelli M., Falbo L., Fratalocchi L., Lietti L. // Catal. Today. 2016. V. 277. № 1. P. 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.04.010
  21. 21. Peña M.A., Fierro J.L.G. // Chem. Rev. 2001. V. 101. P. 1981. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr980129f
  22. 22. Escalona N., Fuentealba S., Pecchi G. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2010. V. 381. P. 253 s://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.04.022
  23. 23. Hou Y., Wang X., Chen M., Gao X., Liu Y., Guo Q. // Atmosphere. 2022. V. 13. P. 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13050760
  24. 24. Borodina E.M., Yafarova L.V., Kryuchkova T.A., Sheshko T.F., Cherednichenko A.G., Zvereva I.A. // Catalysts. 2023. V. 13. № 1. P. 8 s://doi.org/10.3390/catal13010008
  25. 25. Yafarova L.V., Chislova I.V., Zvereva I.A., Kryuchkova T.A, Kost V.V., Sheshko T.F. // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2019. V. 92. P. 264 s://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05013-3
  26. 26. Sheshko T.F., Borodina E.M., Yafarova L.V., Markova E.B., Kryuchkova T.A., Cherednichenko A.G., Zvereva I.A., Terent’ev A.O. // Catalysts. 2023. V. 13. P. 1256. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13091256
  27. 27. Zhao K., He F., Huang Z., Wei G., Zheng A., Li H., Zhao Z. // Appl. Energy. 2016. V. 168. P. 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.052
  28. 28. Liao M., Xiang R., Dai Z., Qin H., Guo W., Xiao H. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2024. V. 73. P. 547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.070
  29. 29. Wang F., Shiyi Ch., Shubo Ch., Du J., Duan L., Xiang W. // Chem. Eng. J. 2023. V. 465. Art. 143041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.143041
  30. 30. Yin X., Shen L., Wang S., Wang B., Shen C. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2022. V. 301. Art. 120816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120816
  31. 31. Xia Y., Gao M., Pu G., Lu X., Gao J., Wu J., Yang Q. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024. V. 12. Art. 114176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.114176
  32. 32. Li W., Li C., Liao Y., Liang S., Ma X. // Chem. Eng. J. 2023. V. 471. Art. 144457 s://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.144457
  33. 33. Popov М.Р., Starkov I.A., Bychkov S.Р., Nemudry А.Р. // J. Membr. Sci. 2014. V. 469. P. 88. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.022
  34. 34. Zhao K., Shen Y., Huang Z., He F., Wei G., Zheng A., Li H., Zhao Z. // J. Energy Chem. 2017. V. 26. № 3. P. 501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2016.11.016
  35. 35. He F., Li X.A., Zhao K., Huang Z., Wei G.Q., Li H.B. // Fuel. 2013. V. 108. P. 465 s://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.035
  36. 36. Maiti D., Hare D.J., Daza Y.A., Ramos A.E., Kuhn J.N., Bhethanabotla V.R. // Energy Environ. Sci. 2018. V. 11. P. 648 s://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE03383D
  37. 37. Zhu Q., Cheng H., Zou X., Lu X., Xu Q., Zhou Z. // Chin. J. Catal. 2015. V. 36. P. 915 s://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60303-X
  38. 38. Fu W., Liu Sh., He Y., Chen J., Ren J., Chen H., Sun R., Tang Zh., Mebrahtu Ch., Zeng F. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2024. V. 678. Art. 119720 s://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2024.119720
  39. 39. Kang S.C., Jun K.W., Lee Y.J. // Energy Fuels. 2013. V. 27. P. 6377. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef401177k
  40. 40. Yang E., Noh Y., Ramesh S., Lim S. S., Moon D. J. // Fuel Process. Technol. 2015. V. 134. P. 404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.02.023
  41. 41. Pawelec B., Guil-López R., Mota N., Fierro J.L.G., Yerga R.M.N. // Materials. 2021. V. 14. № 22. P. 6952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226952
  42. 42. Goguet A., Meunier F.C., Tibiletti D., Breen J.P., Burch R. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2004. V. 108. P. 20240. https://doi.org/10.1021/JP047242W
  43. 43. Liu X., Wang M., Zhou C., Zhou W., Cheng K., Kang J., Wang Y. // Chem. Commun. 2018. V. 54. P. 140. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cc08642c
  44. 44. Ronda-Lloret M., Rothenberg G., Shiju N. R. // ChemSusChem. 2019. V. 12. № 17. P. 3896 s://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201900915
  45. 45. Sheshko T.F., Akhmina P.V., Skvortsova L.G., Borodina E.M., Kryuchkova T.A., Zvereva I.A., Cherednichenko A.G. // Catalysts. 2025. V. 15. P. 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15010067
  46. 46. Zhou W., Cheng K., Kang J., Zhou Ch., Subramanian V., Zhang Q., Wang Y. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019. V. 48. P. 3193. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00502h
  47. 47. Li T., Zhang L., Liang J., Han Y., Liu Zh., Sui J., Liu Q., Li T., Xing T., Liu G., Zhang P., Feng X., Jin Z., Tsubaki N. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025. Art. 2505432. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202505432
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library