RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceКинетика и катализ Kinetics and Catalysis

  • ISSN (Print) 0453-8811
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5413

Features of propane dehydrogenation on Mn/γ-AlO catalysts produced by various methods

PII
S3034541325040025-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034541325040025
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 66 / Issue number 4
Pages
262-270
Abstract
The physicochemical and catalytic properties of Mn-containing catalysts based on γ-AlO, obtained by various methods, were studied in the process of converting propane into olefin hydrocarbons. The dependence of the activity and selectivity of the catalytic systems on the localization of the introduced manganese and their acidic properties was shown. It was found that the greatest amount of olefin hydrocarbons during the conversion of propane is formed on the Mn-containing catalyst, into which manganese was introduced by the impregnation method. The nature and amount of carbon deposits formed on the studied catalysts during the propane conversion process were established. It was shown that the coke deposits formed on the Mn-containing catalysts have a virtually uniform structure and are characterized by a low degree of condensation, which allows for their relatively easy oxidative regeneration.
Keywords
пропан дегидрирование Mn/γ-AlO кокс конверсия активность селективность
Date of publication
01.04.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
24

References

  1. 1. Loiland J.A., Zhao Z., Patel A., Hazin P. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019. V. 58. № 6. P. 2170.
  2. 2. Sattler J.J.H.B., Ruiz-Martinez J., Santillan-Jimenez E., Weckhuysen B.M. // Chem. Rev. 2014. V. 114. № 20. P. 10613.
  3. 3. Chen F., Hao J., Yu Y., Cheng D.-G., Zhan X. // Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2022. V. 330. Art. 111575.
  4. 4. Sattler J.J.H.B., Ruiz-Martinez J., Santillan-Jimenez E., Weckhuysen B.M. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014. V. 53. P. 9251.
  5. 5. Docherty S.R., Rochlitz L., Payard P.A., Coperet C. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021. V. 50. № 9. P. 5806.
  6. 6. Nawaz Z. // Rev. Chem. Eng. 2015. V. 31. № 5. P. 413.
  7. 7. Wang H.-Z., Zhao Z.-J., Yang W., Zhang L., Gong J. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018. V. 57. № 26. P. 8647.
  8. 8. Брагинский О.Б. Мировая нефтехимическая промышленность. Москва: Наука, 2003.
  9. 9. Крылов О.В. Гетерогенный катализ. Москва: ИКЦ Академкнига, 2004.
  10. 10. Tan Y., Zeng L., Yuan X., Gong J. // ChemCatChem. 2016. V. 8. № 3. P. 569.
  11. 11. Feng B., Wei Y.-C., Song W.-Y., Xu C.-M. // Chin. J. Catal. 2022. V. 19. № 2. P. 819.
  12. 12. Zubkov A.V., Bugrova T.A., Evdokimova E.V., Mamontov G.V. // Kinet. Catal. 2025. V. 66. P. 65.
  13. 13. Sun M., Sixiang Z., Chenchen W., Haoyu W., ZhongYong Y. // Mol. Catal. 2024. V. 558. Art. 114029.
  14. 14. Sheng W., Yuxin F., Lin Y., Peng W., Jiayue X., Dan Y., Xupeng Z., Yu T., Yihu D., Yanhui Y. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2025. V. 371. Art. 125233.
  15. 15. Sharma L., Jiang X., Wu Z., Baltrus J., Rangarajan S., Baltrusaitis J. // J. Catal. 2021. № 394. P. 142.
  16. 16. Xiao H., Sun H., Qi F., Wang C., Li X. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016. V. 6. № 13. P. 4766.
  17. 17. Cholewinski M., Dixit M., Mpourmpakis G. // ACS Omega. 2018. № 3. P. 18242.
  18. 18. Joubert J., Fleurat-Lessard P., Delbecq F., Sautet P. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006. № 110. P. 7392.
  19. 19. Dixit M., Kostetskyy P., Mpourmpakis G. // ACS Catal. 2018. № 8. P. 11570.
  20. 20. Vosmerikov A.A., Stepanov A.A., Vosmerikova L.N., Gerasimov E.Y., Vosmerikov A.V. // Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 2025. V. 99. № 1. P. 44.
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library