Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceКинетика и катализ Kinetics and Catalysis

  • ISSN (Print) 0453-8811
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5413

Bimetallic (Co, Fe, Ni)MgAlO layered double hydroxides based catalysts for the process of ammonia decomposition

You can
PII
S3034541325040048-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034541325040048
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Z.A. Fedorova
  • Affiliation:
    Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
    Institute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry SB RAS
V.A. Borisov
  • Affiliation: New Chemical Technologies Center, Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
B. Abbas
  • Affiliation: Novosibirsk State University
V.P. Pakharukova
  • Affiliation: Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
E.Yu. Gerasimov
  • Affiliation: Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
A.Yu. Gladkiy
  • Affiliation: Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
D.A. Shlyapin
  • Affiliation: Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
P.V. Snytnikov
  • Affiliation: Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
Volume/ Edition
Volume 66 / Issue number 4
Pages
281-292
Abstract
In this work, monometallic MMgAlO and bimetallic MMMgAlO (M – Co,Fe, Ni) layered double hydroxides based catalysts were synthesized by the coprecipitation method. It was found that the samples dried at 110°C are layered double hydroxides with a hydrotalcite structure. After calcination at 550°C, the samples form mixed oxides with a specific nanostructure, intermediate between the NaCl and spinel type structures. The samples are characterized by a high specific surface area (105–209 m/g). The catalytic activity was studied in the ammonia decomposition process. Among all the catalysts, the CoNiMgAlO catalyst has the highest activity: at 550°C and GHSV 72000 mL h g ammonia conversion was 32%, which corresponds to H productivity of 25.7 mmol g min. According to the TEM, it was found that the average size of metal particles in the CoNiMgAlO catalyst is 10–14 nm. The CoNiMgAlO catalyst showed stable activity during the all testing period in the ammonia decomposition process (~40 h).
Keywords
биметаллические катализаторы разложение аммиака никелевые катализаторы никель-кобальтовые катализаторы слоистые двойные гидроксиды
Date of publication
01.04.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
26

References

  1. 1. Mukherjee S., Devaguptapu S.V., Sviripa A., Lund C.R.F., Wu G. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018. V. 226. P. 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.039
  2. 2. Autrey T., Chen P. // J. Energy Chem. 2023. V. 77. P. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2022.10.039
  3. 3. Naseem K., Qin F., Khalid F., Suo G., Zahra T., Chen Z., Javed Z. // Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025. V. 210. Art. 115196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115196
  4. 4. Chirosca A.-M., Rusu E., Minzu V. // Energies. 2024. V. 17. P. 5820. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17235820
  5. 5. Aziz M., Wijayanta A.T., Nandiyanto A.B.D. // Energies. 2020. V. 13. P. 3062. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123062
  6. 6. Bartels J.R., Pate M.B. // Final report. Grant number: 07S-01, 2008.
  7. 7. Andersson J., Gronkvist S. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. P. 11901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.063
  8. 8. Ma N., Zhao W., Wang W., Li X., Zhou H. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2024. V. 50. P. 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.021
  9. 9. Demirci U.B. // Energy Technol. 2018. V. 6. P. 470. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201700486
  10. 10. Jepsen L.H., Ley M.B., Lee Y.-S., Cho Y.W., Dornheim M., Jensen J.O., Filinchuk Y., Jorgensen J.E., Besenbacher F., Jensen T.R. // Mater. Today. 2014. V. 17. P. 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.02.015
  11. 11. Klopčič N., Grimmer I., Winkler F., Sartory M., Trattner A. // J. Energy Storage. 2023. V. 72. Art. 108456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108456
  12. 12. Bourane A., Elanany M., Pham T.V., Katikaneni S.P. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2016. V. 41. P. 23075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.167
  13. 13. MacFarlane D.R., Cherepanov P.V., Choi J., Suryanto B.H.R., Hodgetts R.Y., Bakker J.M., Ferrero Vallana F.M., Simonov A.N. // Joule. 2020. V. 4. P. 1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.04.004
  14. 14. Sayas S., Morlanes N., Katikaneni S.P., Harale A., Solami B., Gascon J. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020. V. 10. P. 5027. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY00686F
  15. 15. Klerke A., Christensen C.H., Norskov J.K., Vegge T. // J. Mater. Chem. 2008. V. 18. P. 2304. https://doi.org/10.1039/b720020j
  16. 16. Valera-Medina A., Xiao H., Owen-Jones M., David W.I.F., Bowen P.J. // Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2018. V. 69. P. 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.07.001
  17. 17. Schuth F., Palkovits R., Schlogl R., Su D.S. // Energy Environ. Sci. 2012. V. 5. P. 6278. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE02865D
  18. 18. Guler M., Dogu T., Varisli D. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017. V. 219. P. 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.043
  19. 19. Le T.A., Kim Y., Kim H.W., Lee S.-U., Kim J.-R., Kim T.-W., Lee Y.-J. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2021. V. 285. Art. 119831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119831
  20. 20. Chen C., Wu K., Ren H., Zhou C., Luo Y., Lin L., Au C., Jiang L. // Energy & Fuels. 2021. V. 35. P. 11693. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01261
  21. 21. Le T.A., Do Q.C., Kim Y., Kim T.-W., Chae H.-J. // Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2021. V. 38. P. 1087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-0767-7
  22. 22. Pinzon M., Sanchez-Sanchez A., Romero A., de la Osa A.R., Sanchez P. // Fuel. 2022. V. 323. Art. 124384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124384
  23. 23. Li H., Guo L., Qu J., Fang X., Fu Y., Duan J., Wang W., Li C. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2023. V. 48. P. 8985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.338
  24. 24. Gong X., Li N., Li Y., Hu R. // Mol. Catal. 2022. V. 531. Art. 112651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112651
  25. 25. Yi Y., Wang L., Guo Y., Sun S., Guo H. // AIChE J. 2019. V. 65. P. 691. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16479
  26. 26. Shimoda N., Yoshimura R., Nukui T., Satokawa S. // J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2019. V. 52. P. 413. https://doi.org/10.1252/jcej.18we226
  27. 27. Wu Z.-W., Li X., Qin Y.-H., Deng L., Wang C.-W., Jiang X. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020. V. 45. P. 15263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.007
  28. 28. Huang C., Li H., Yang J., Wang C., Hu F., Wang X., Lu Z.-H., Feng G., Zhang R. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019. V. 478. P. 708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.269
  29. 29. Ganley J.C., Thomas F.S., Seebauer E.G., Masel R.I. // Catal. Lett. 2004. V. 96. P. 117.
  30. 30. Guo W., Vlachos D.G. // Nat. Commun. 2015. V. 6. P. 8619. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9619
  31. 31. Lucentini I., Casanovas A., Llorca J. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. P. 12693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.154
  32. 32. Hill A.K., Torrente-Murciano L. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015. V. 172–173. P. 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.02.011
  33. 33. He H., Jiang H., Yang F., Liu J., Zhang W., Jin M., Li Z. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2023. V. 48. P. 5030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.255
  34. 34. Duan X., Ji J., Qian G., Fan C., Zhu Y., Zhou X., Chen D., Yuan W. // J. Mol. Catal. A. Chem. 2012. V. 357. P. 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2012.01.023
  35. 35. Fu E., Qiu Y., Lu H., Wang S., Liu L., Feng H., Yang Y., Wu Z., Xie Y., Gong F., Xiao R. // Fuel Process. Technol. 2021. V. 221. Art. 106945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106945
  36. 36. Hu X.-C., Wang W.-W., Jin Z., Wang X., Si R., Jia C.J. // J. Energy Chem. 2019. V. 38. P. 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2018.12.024
  37. 37. Akca M., Varisli D. // Mol. Catal. 2020. V. 485. Art. 110823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2020.110823
  38. 38. Chen W., Shi Y., Liu C., Ren Z., Huang Z., Chen Z., Zhang X., Liang S., Xie L., Lian C., Qian G., Zhang J., Liu X., Chen D., Zhou X., Yuan W., Duan X. // Nat. Commun. 2024. V. 15. P. 8995. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53474-0
  39. 39. Simonsen S.B., Chakraborty D., Chorkendorff I., Dahl S. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2012. V. 447–448. P. 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.08.045
  40. 40. Muroyama H., Saburi C., Matsui T., Eguchi K. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2012. V. 443–444. P. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.07.031
  41. 41. Podila S., Driss H., Zaman S.F., Alhamed Y.A., AlZahrani A.A., Daous M.A., Petrov L.A. // J. Mol. Catal. A. Chem. 2016. V. 414. P. 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2016.01.012
  42. 42. Podila S., Alhamed Y.A., AlZahrani A.A, Petrov L.A. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2015. V. 40. P. 1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.057
  43. 43. Karolewska M., Truszkiewicz E., Mierzwa B., Kępiński L., Rarog-Pilecka W. // Appl. Catal. A. Gen. 2012. V. 445–446. P. 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.08.028
  44. 44. Huang C., Li H., Yang J., Wang C., Hu F., Wang X., Lu Z.-H., Feng G., Zhang R. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019. V. 478. P. 708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.269
  45. 45. Sima D., Wu H., Tian K., Xie S., Foo J.J., Li S., Wang D., Ye Y., Zheng Z., Liu Y.-Q. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020. V. 45. P. 9342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.209
  46. 46. Zhang L.-F., Li M., Ren T.-Z., Liu X., Yuan Z.-Y. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2015. V. 40. P. 2648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.079
  47. 47. Varisli D., Kaykac N.G. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2016. V. 41. P. 5955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.097
  48. 48. Zhang H., Alhamed Y.A., Chu W., Ye Z., AlZahrani A., Petrov L. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2013. V. 464–465. P. 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.05.046
  49. 49. Zhang H., Alhamed Y.A., Al-Zahrani A., Daous M., Inokawa H., Kojima Y., Petrov L.A. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2014. V. 39. P. 17573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.183
  50. 50. Takehira K. // Appl. Clay Sci. 2017. V. 136. P. 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.11.012
  51. 51. Chen S., Perathoner S., Ampelli C., Mebrahtu C., Su D., Centi G. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017. V. 56. P. 2699. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201609533
  52. 52. Lin X., Li R., Lu M., Chen C., Li D., Zhan Y., Jiang L. // Fuel. 2015. V. 162. P. 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.021
  53. 53. Balsamo N., Mendieta S., Oliva M., Eimer G., Crivello M. // Mater. Sci. 2012. V. 1. P. 506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2012.06.068
  54. 54. Fan G., Li F., Evans D.G., Duan X. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014. V. 43. P. 7040. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00160E
  55. 55. Zou J., Xie D., Xu J., Song X., Zeng X., Wang H., Zhao F. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022. V. 571. Art. 151322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151322
  56. 56. Wang Q., O’Hare D. // Chem. Rev. 2012. V. 112. P. 4124. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200434v
  57. 57. Wiyantoko B., Kurniawati P., Purbaningtias T.E., Fatimah I. // Procedia Chem. 2015. V. 17. P. 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2015.12.115
  58. 58. Su Q., Wang H., Gu L., Ji W., Au C.-T. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2021. V. 46. P. 31122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.020
  59. 59. Podila S., Driss H., Zaman S.F., Ali A.M., Al-Zahrani A.A., Daous M.A., Petrov L.A. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020. V. 45. P. 873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.107
  60. 60. Sikander U., Samsudin M.F., Sufian S., KuShaari K., Kait C.F., Naqvi S.R., Chen W.-H. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. P. 14424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.224
  61. 61. Sato K., Abe N., Kawagoe T., Miyahara S., Honda K., Nagaoka K. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2017. V. 42. P. 6610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.150
  62. 62. Fedorova Z.A., Borisov V.A., Pakharukova V.P., Gerasimov E.Y., Belyaev V.D., Gulyaeva T.I., Shlyapin D.A., Snytnikov P.V. // Catalysts. 2023. V. 13. P. 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040678
  63. 63. Rodrigues A.C.C., Henriques C.A., Monteiro J.L.F. // Mater. Res. 2003. V. 6. P. 563. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392003000400024
  64. 64. Cherepanova S.V., Leont’eva N.N., Arbuzov A.B., Drozdov V.A., Belskaya O.B., Antonicheva N.V. // J. Solid State Chem. 2015. V. 225. P. 417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2015.01.022
  65. 65. Li Q., Meng M., Tsubaki N., Li X., Li Z., Xie Y., Hu T., Zhang J. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2009. V. 91. P. 406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.06.007
  66. 66. Gallego G.S., Batiot-Dupeyrat C., Barrault J., Florez E., Mondragon F. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2008. V. 334. P. 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.10.010
  67. 67. Xu J., Zhou W., Li Z., Wang J., Ma J. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2009. V. 34. P. 6646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.038
  68. 68. Horlyck J., Lawrey C., Lovell E.C., Amal R., Scott J. // Chem. Eng. J. 2018. V. 352. P. 572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.009
  69. 69. Abd Ghani N.A., Azapour A., Syed Muhammad A.F., Abdullah B. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. P. 20881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.153
  70. 70. Huangluo E., Wei H., Wang Y., Zhou L. // Surf. Sci. 2024. V. 745. Art. 122483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2024.122483
  71. 71. Lendzion-Bielun Z., Narkiewicz U., Arabczyk W. // Materials (Basel). 2013. V. 6. P. 2400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6062400
  72. 72. Li X., Ji W., Zhao J., Wang S., Au C. // J. Catal. 2005. V. 236. P. 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2005.09.030
  73. 73. Sun Y., Zeng W., Yang Y., Wu Q., Zou C. // Chem. Eng. J. 2024. V. 502. Art. 158043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.158043
  74. 74. Wang Y., Mao X., Yang J., Wang J., Guan W., Chen J., Han B., Tian Z. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2022. V. 47. P. 2608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.187
  75. 75. Su Q., Gu L., Yao Y., Zhao J., Ji W., Ding W., Au C.-T. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017. V. 201. P. 451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.05
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library