RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceКинетика и катализ Kinetics and Catalysis

  • ISSN (Print) 0453-8811
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5413

Kinetic regularities of CNF synthesis on Ni–Cu–AlO catalyst in the reaction of CH decomposition

PII
S3034541325040059-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034541325040059
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 66 / Issue number 4
Pages
293-307
Abstract
The work is aimed at studying the kinetic patterns of carbon nanofiber (CNF) growth on the Ni–Cu–AlO catalyst in the methane decomposition reaction. The catalyst was prepared by mechanochemical activation in an Activator-2S planetary mill. The dependence of the catalytic activity of the Ni–Cu alloy on the hydrogen concentration (0–28 vol. %) in the decomposed mixture (CH/H) was studied in a flow gravimetric setup with a McBain balance. It is shown that in the absence of hydrogen, the CNF accumulation rate rapidly decreases. The introduction of 10 vol. % hydrogen in the reaction mixture allows stabilizing the CNF formation rate over 90 min of the reaction (600°C, CNF yield = 41.4 g/g). The observed reaction order with respect to hydrogen was estimated to be –0.18 at low H concentrations (0–16 vol. %) and –1.5 at its higher content in the reaction mixture (16–28 vol. %). The effect of pyrolysis temperature on the nature of the CNF accumulation kinetics was studied in the range of 550–700°C. The values of the observed activation energy (E) were determined at different time intervals of the process. It was found that E does not depend on the presence of hydrogen in the reaction mixture. The morphology and structure of the CNF samples obtained at different hydrogen contents in the reaction mixture were studied by transmission electron microscopy. It was shown that with increasing hydrogen concentration, there is a tendency to form larger CNF with a defective structure. The textural characteristics of the carbon material were measured by argon adsorption at 87 K. The specific surface area of the CNF varies from 90 to 150 m²/g depending on the reaction conditions. The obtained results can be used in the development of a mathematical model of a catalytic pyrolysis reactor of methane.
Keywords
каталитический пиролиз метан механохимическая активация углеродные нановолокна водород Ni–Cu-сплав
Date of publication
01.04.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
26

References

  1. 1. Пинаева Л.Г., Носков А.С., Пармон В.Н. // Катализ в промышленности. 2017. № 3. C. 184.
  2. 2. Степанов А.А., Восмериков А.В. // НефтеГазоХимия. 2024. № 3–4. C. 56.
  3. 3. Гаврилов Ю.В., Гришин Д.А., Джиан Х., Дигуров Н.Г., Насибулин А.Г., Кауппинен Е.И. // Журнал физической химии. 2007. T. 81. № 9. C. 1686.
  4. 4. McConnachie M., Konarova M., Smart S. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2023. V. 48. № 66. P. 25660.
  5. 5. Riley J., Atallah C., Siriwardane R., Stevens R. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2021. V. 46. № 39. P. 20338.
  6. 6. Yang X., Li L., Nishiyama Y., Reid M.S., Berglund L.A. // Carbohydr. Polym. 2023. V. 312. Art. 120788.
  7. 7. Коваленко Г.А., Перминова Л.В., Гойдин В.В., Заворин А.В., Мосеенков С.И., Кузнецов В.Л. // Кинетика и катализ. 2023. T. 64. № 2. C. 227.
  8. 8. Ruiz-Cornejo J.C., Sebastian D., Lazaro M.J. // Rev. Chem. Eng. 2020. V. 36. № 4. P. 493.
  9. 9. Веселов Г.Б., Шивцов Д.М., Афонникова С.Д., Мишаков И.В., Ведягин А.А. // Кинетика и катализ. 2023. T. 64. № 6. C. 857.
  10. 10. Farias C.B.B., Barreiros R.C.S., da Silva M.F., Casazza A.A., Converti A., Sarubbo L.A. // Energies. 2022. V. 15. № 1. P. 311.
  11. 11. Wang I.W., Kutteri D.A., Gao B., Tian H., Hu J. // Energy Fuel. 2018. V. 33. № 1. P. 197.
  12. 12. Vlaskin M.S., Grigorenko A.V., Gromov A.A., Kumar V., Dudoladov A.O., Slavkina O.V., Darishchev V.I. // Res. Eng. 2022. V. 15. Art. 100598.
  13. 13. Чесноков В.В., Буянов Р.А. // Успехи химии. 2000. Т. 69. № 7. С. 675.
  14. 14. Chesnokov V.V., Chichkan A.S. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2009. V. 34. № 7. P. 2979.
  15. 15. Awad A., Masiran N., Abdus Salam M., Vo D.-V.N., Abdullah B. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2019. V. 44. № 37. P. 20889.
  16. 16. Reshetenko T.V., Avdeeva L.B., Ismagilov Z.R., Chuvilin A.L., Ushakov V.A. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2003. V. 247. № 1. P. 51.
  17. 17. Чесноков В.В. // Кинетика и катализ. 2022. Т. 63. № 1. С. 77.
  18. 18. Amrute A.P., De Bellis J., Felderhoff M., Schuth F. // Chem. Eur. J. 2021. V. 27. № 23. P. 6819.
  19. 19. Мишаков И.В., Афонникова С.Д., Бауман Ю.И., Шубин Ю.В., Тренихин М.В., Серкова А.Н., Ведягин А.А. // Кинетика и катализ. 2022. T. 63. № 1. C. 110.
  20. 20. Shelepova E.V., Maksimova T.A., Bauman Y.I., Ayupov A.B., Mishakov I.V., Vedyagin A.A. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2024. V. 82. P. 662.
  21. 21. Schoemaker S.E., Welling T.A.J., Wezendonk D.F.L., Reesink B.H., van Bavel A.P., de Jongh P.E. // Catal. Today. 2023. V. 418. Art. 114110.
  22. 22. Wang H.Y., Lua A.C. // Chem. Eng. J. 2014. V. 243. P. 79.
  23. 23. Borghei M., Karimzadeh R., Rashidi A., Izadi N. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2010. V. 35. № 17. P. 9479.
  24. 24. Alstrup I., Tavares M.T. // J. Catal. 1993. V. 139. № 2. P. 513.
  25. 25. Powder Diffraction File. PDF_2/Release 2009: International Centre for Diffraction Data, USA.
  26. 26. Kraus W., Nolze G. // J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1996. V. 29. № 3. P. 301.
  27. 27. Thommes M., Kaneko K., Neimark A.V., Olivier J.P., Rodriguez-Reinoso F., Rouquerol J., Sing K.S.W. // Pure Appl. Chem. 2015. V. 87. № 9–10. P. 1051.
  28. 28. Mel’gunov M.S. // Adsorption. 2023. V. 29. № 5. P. 199.
  29. 29. Neimark A.V., Lin Y., Ravikovitch P.I., Thommes M. // Carbon. 2009. V. 47. № 7. P. 1617.
  30. 30. Monshi A., Foroughi M.R., Monshi M.R. // World J. Nano Sci. Eng. 2012. V. 2. № 3. P. 154.
  31. 31. Shivtsov D.M., Veselov G.B., Afonnikova S.D., Ayupov A.B., Shubin Y.V., Bauman Y.I., Mishakov I.V., Shelepova E.V., Vedyagin A.A. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2025. V. 149. Art. 150082.
  32. 32. Shen Y., Lua A.C. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2015. V. 164. P. 61.
  33. 33. Dipu A.L. // Int. J. Energy Res. 2021. V. 45. № 7. P. 9858.
  34. 34. Fedorov A.V., Kukushkin R.G., Yeletsky P.M., Bulavchenko O.A., Chesаlоv Y.A., Yakovlev V.A. // J. Alloys Compd. 2020. V. 844. Art. 156135.
  35. 35. Afonnikova S.D., Gilin D.A., Veselov G.B., Trenikhin M.V., Shubin Y.V., Ayupov A.B., Mishakov I.V., Vedyagin A.A. // Fuel. 2024. V. 375. Art. 132542.
  36. 36. Villacampa J.I., Royo C., Romeo E., Montoya J.A., Del Angel P., Monzon A. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2003. V. 252. № 2. P. 363.
  37. 37. Li J., Xiao C., Xiong L., Chen X., Zhao L., Dong L., Du Y., Yang Y., Wang H., Peng S. // RSC Adv. 2016. V. 6. № 57. P. 52154.
  38. 38. Shelepova E.V., Maksimova T.A., Bauman Y.I., Mishakov I.V., Vedyagin A.A. // Hydrogen. 2022. V. 3. № 4. P. 450.
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library