Везде

RAS Chemistry & Material ScienceКинетика и катализ Kinetics and Catalysis

  • ISSN (Print) 0453-8811
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5413

Dry reforming of methane into synthesis gas on oxide catalysts Ni/CeSnO: effect of the template nature

You can
PII
S3034541325060025-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034541325060025
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
I. Yu. Kaplin
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
A. A. Zorina
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
E. S. Lokteva
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
P. A. Chernavsky
  • Affiliation:
    Lomonosov Moscow State University
    A.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis RAS
    N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry RAS
E. V. Golubina
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
A. O. Kamaev
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
S. V. Maksimov
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
K. I. Maslakov
  • Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Volume/ Edition
Volume 66 / Issue number 6
Pages
495-512
Abstract
The work is devoted to revealing the influence of the synthesis method, namely the nature of the template, on the catalytic properties of the supported Ni/CeSnO systems in dry reforming of methane (DRM) in a flow system with a fixed catalyst bed. A comparison of the characteristics of catalysts obtained using different templates (ionic – cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), non-ionic polymer Pluronic-123 (P123), biotemplate – pine sawdust) and containing cerium and tin in a molar ratio of Ce : Sn = 9:1 was carried out. The mass content of nickel was 3%. The catalysts were characterized by temperature-programmed reduction with hydrogen, X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, and magnetometry. The systems obtained in the presence of the biotemplate and P123 were active in CDRM. The highest values of steady-state conversion of methane (11%) and carbon dioxide (29%) were provided by the Ni/CeO–SnO–P123 catalyst. Analysis of the results of physicochemical methods showed that the Ni/CeO–SnO–P123 sample has the most uniform distribution and increased dispersion of nickel particles. It was found that the use of the P123 polymer template contributes to the formation of a greater number of interaction centers of nickel with the tin-containing oxide phase in the Ni/CeSnO–P123. The nature of the template significantly affects the structural state of the active component and, as a consequence, the catalytic characteristics in DRM.
Keywords
углекислотная конверсия метана оксидные катализаторы темплатные методы синтеза диоксид церия диоксид олова никель
Date of publication
17.09.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
54

References

  1. 1. Usman M., Wan Daud W.M.A., Abbas H.F. // Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015. V. 45. P. 710.
  2. 2. Rostrup-Nielsen J., Sehested J., Nørskov J. // Adv. Catal. 2002. V. 47. P. 65.
  3. 3. Nagaoka K., Okamura M., Aika K. // Catal. Commun. 2001. V. 2. № 8. P. 255.
  4. 4. de Araújo Moreira T.G., de Carvalho Filho J.F.S., Carvalho Y., de Almeida J.M.A.R., Romano P.N., Sousa-Aguiar E.F. // Fuel. 2021. V. 287. Art. 119536.
  5. 5. García-Diéguez M., Finocchio E., Larrubia M.Á., Alemany L.J., Busca G. // J. Catal. 2010. V. 274. № 1. P.11.
  6. 6. Wang H., Ruckenstein E. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2001. V. 209. № 1–2. P. 207.
  7. 7. San José-Alonso D., Illán-Gómez M.J., Román-Martínez M.C. // Int. J Hydrogen Energy. 2013. V. 38. № 5. P. 2230.
  8. 8. Nikoo M., Amin N. // Fuel Process. Technol. 2011. V.92. № 3. P. 678.
  9. 9. Aramouni N.A.K., Zeaiter J., Kwapinski W., AhmadM.N. // Energy Convers. Manag. 2017. V. 150. P.614.
  10. 10. Han J.W., Park J.S., Choi M.S., Lee H. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017. V. 203. P. 625.
  11. 11. Amin M.H., Mantri K., Newnham J., Tardio J., Bhargava S.K. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2012. V. 119–120. P. 217.
  12. 12. Gallego G.S., Mondragón F., Barrault J., Tatibouët J.-M., Batiot-Dupeyrat C. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2006. V.311. P. 164.
  13. 13. Bhavani A.G., Kim W.Y., Kim J.Y., Lee J.S. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2013. V. 450. P. 63.
  14. 14. Kim J.-H., Suh D.J., Park T.-J., Kim K.-L. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2000. V. 197. № 2. P. 191.
  15. 15. Guo J., Lou H., Zhao H., Chai D., Zheng X. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2004. V. 273 № 1–2. P. 75.
  16. 16. Liu Z., Grinter D.C., Lustemberg P.G., Nguyen-Phan T.-D., Zhou Y., Luo S., Waluyo, I., Crumlin E.J., StacchiolaD.J., Zhou J., Carrasco J., Busnengo H.F., Ganduglia-Pirovano M.V., Senanayake S.D., Rodriguez J.A. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016. V. 55. № 26. P. 7455.
  17. 17. Makri M.M., Vasiliades M.A., Petallidou K.C., Efstathiou A.M. // Catal. Today. 2016. V. 259. P. 150.
  18. 18. Damaskinos C.M., Vasiliades M.A., Efstathiou A.M. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2019. V. 579. P. 116.
  19. 19. Kašpar J., Fornasiero P., Graziani M. // Catal. Today. 1999. V. 50. № 2. P. 285.
  20. 20. Das S., Jangam A., Jayaprakash S., Mandal S., Gosavi P.V., Chilukuri S. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2021. V.290. Art. 119998.
  21. 21. Ayastuy J.L., Iglesias-González A., Gutiérrez-OrtizM.A.// Chem. Eng. J. 2014. V. 244. P. 372.
  22. 22. Gupta A., Hegde M.S., Priolkar K.R., Waghmare U.V., Sarode P.R., Emura S. // Chem. Mater. 2009. V. 21. №24. P. 5836.
  23. 23. Stonkus O.A., Zadesenets A.V., Slavinskaya E.M., Stadnichenko A.I., Svetlichnyi V.A., Shubin Y.V., KorenevS.V., Boronin A.I. // Catal. Commun. 2022. V.172. Art. 106554.
  24. 24. Slavinskaya E.M., Zadesenets A.V., Stonkus O.A., Stadnichenko A.I., Shchukarev A.V., Shubin Y.V., KorenevS.V., Boronin A.I. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020. V. 277. Art. 119275.
  25. 25. Gu Y., Liu C., Li Y., Sui X., Wang K., Wang Z. // J.Power Sources. 2014. V. 265. P. 335.
  26. 26. Baidya T., Gupta A., Deshpandey P. A., Madras G., Hegde M.S. // J. Phys. Chem. C 2009. V. 113. № 10. P. 4059.
  27. 27. Trovarelli A., Zamar F., Llorca J., de Leitenburg C., Dolcetti G., Kiss J.T. // J. Catal. 1997. V. 169. № 2. P.490.
  28. 28. Rossignol S., Madier Y., Duprez D. // Catal. Today. 1999. V. 50. № 2. P. 261.
  29. 29. Montoya J., Romero-Pascual E., Gimon C. // Catal. Today. 2000. V. 63. № 1. P. 71.
  30. 30. Larrondo S., Vidal M.A., Irigoyen B., Craievich A.F., Lamas D.G. // Catal. Today 2005. V. 107. P. 53.
  31. 31. Kaplin I.Yu., Lokteva E.S., Golubina E.V., Lunin V.V. // Molecules 2020. V. 25. № 18. P. 4242.
  32. 32. Kaplin I.Yu., Lokteva E.S., Tikhonov A.V., MaslakovK.I., Isaikina O.Yu., Golubina E.V. // Catalysts. 2022. V. 12. № 12. P. 1575.
  33. 33. Kaplin I.Yu., Lokteva E.S., Tikhonov A.V., ZhilyaevK.A., Golubina E.V., Maslakov K.I., Kamaev A.O., Isaikina O.Yu. // Top. Catal. 2020. V. 63. № 1–2. P. 86.
  34. 34. Chen J., Wu Q., Zhang J., Zhang J. // Fuel 2008. V. 87. № 13–14. P. 2901.
  35. 35. Chernavskii P., Pankina G., Lunin V. // Russ. Chem. Rev. 2011. V. 80. № 6. P. 579.
  36. 36. Kambolis A., Matralis H., Trovarelli A., Papadopoulou C. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2010. V. 377. № 1–2. P. 16.
  37. 37. Wolfbeisser A., Sophiphun O., Bernardi J., Wittayakun J., Föttinger K., Rupprechter G. // Catal. Today 2016. V. 277. P. 234.
  38. 38. Yao X., Xiong Y., Zou W., Zhang L., Wu S., Dong X., Gao F., Deng Y., Tang C., Chen Z., Dong L., Chen Y. // Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2014. V. 144. P. 152.
  39. 39. Yao H.C., Yao Y.F.Y. // J. Catal. 1984. V. 86. № 2. P. 254.
  40. 40. Takeguchi T., Furukawa S., Inoue M. // J. Catal. 2001. V. 202. № 1. P. 14.
  41. 41. Ashok J., Ang M., Kawi S. // Catal. Today. 2017. V. 281. P. 304.
  42. 42. Kuhlenbeck H., Odörfer G., Jaeger R. M., Illing G., Menges M., Mull Th., Freund H.-J., Pöhlchen M., Staemmler V., Witzel S., Scharfschwerdt C., Wennemann K., Liedtke T., Neumann M. // Phys. Rev. B 1991. V. 43. № 3. P. 1969.
  43. 43. Mansour A. // Surf. Sci. Spectra. 1994. V. 3. № 3. P. 239.
  44. 44. Biesinger M.C., Lau L.W.M., Gerson A.R., Smart R.S.C. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012. V. 14. №7. P. 2434.
  45. 45. Kumar S., Kim Y.J., Koo B.H., Lee C.G. // J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010. V. 10. № 11. P. 7204.
  46. 46. Sundaresan A., Bhargavi R., Rangarajan N., Siddesh U., Rao C.N.R. // Phys. Rev. B 2006. V. 74. № 16. Art. 161306(R).
  47. 47. Khakhal H.R., Kumar S., Dolia S.N., Dalela B., Vats V.S., Hashmi S.Z., Alvi P.A., Kumar S., Dalela S. // J. Alloys Compd. 2020. V. 844. Art. 156079.
  48. 48. Tontini G., Koch A. Jr., Schmachtenberg V.A.V., Binder C., Klein A.N., Drago V. // Mater. Res. Bull. 2015. V. 61. P. 177.
  49. 49. Kamble R.B., Varade V., Ramesh K.P., Prasad V. // AIP Adv. 2015. V. 5. № 1. Art. 017119.
  50. 50. Han D., Wang J., Luo H. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1994. V. 136. № 1–2. P. 176.
  51. 51. Ishizaki T., Yatsugi K., Akedo K. // Nanomaterials. 2016. V. 6. № 9. P. 172.
  52. 52. Ávila-Crisóstomo C., Pal U., Pérez-Rodríguez F., Rodríguez-González V. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2020. V. 514. Art. 167102.
  53. 53. Dippong T., Cadar O., Deac I.G., Levei E.A., Borodi G. // J. Alloys Compd. 2020. V. 828. Art. 154409.
  54. 54. Basma H., Rahal H.T., Al-Mokdad F., Romie M., Awad R. // Mater. Res. Express 2019. V. 6. № 7. Art. 075001.
  55. 55. Roy S., Dubenko I., Edorh D., Ali N., Los A.E., Starodubov A.V., Takeuchi A.Y., Gschneidner K.A., Pecharsky V.K. // J. Appl. Phys. 2004. V. 96. № 2. P. 1202.
  56. 56. Du Y. W., Xu M., Wu J., Liu X.D., Zhang Y.H. // J. Appl. Phys. 1991. V. 70. № 10. P. 5903.
  57. 57. Leslie-Pelecky D., Rieke R. // Chem. Mater. 1996. V. 8. № 8. P. 1770.
  58. 58. Грабченко М.В., Дорофеева Н.В., Лапин И.Н., La Parola V., Liotta L.F., Водянкина О.В. // Кинетика и Катализ. 2021. Т. 62. № 6. С. 718.
  59. 59. Fidalgo B., Arenillas A., Menéndez J.A. // Fuel. 2010. V. 89. № 12. P. 4002.
  60. 60. Naeem M.A., Al-Fatesh A.S., Khan W.U., Fakeeha A.H., Al-Zahrani A.A. // Int. J. Chem. Appl. 2013. V. 4. № 5. P. 315.
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library